POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : post-3.5 patching? : Re: post-3.5 patching? Server Time
7 Aug 2024 19:23:24 EDT (-0400)
  Re: post-3.5 patching?  
From: Andy Cocker
Date: 10 Sep 2001 13:25:24
Message: <3b9cf784@news.povray.org>
"Ron Parker" <ron### [at] povrayorg> wrote in message > This is one of those
things we'll never agree on.  Image size, display gamma,
> quality, include paths, and those sorts of things are not inherently part
of
> the scene description.  Those are physical characteristics of the image
you're
> generating rather than a logical description of what it looks like.  They
> should be separated.

I can see your point, but I still think that everything *should* be
optionally set from within the scene file. I mostly used ini_option to
specify image size, and from an artistic point of view, the image size and
aspect ratio are often intrinsic to the desired final image, and IMO *are*
part of the scene description (coming from the point of view previously
stated, that I like scene files to be self-contained. You press RUN, and you
get the image as I designed it).

In any other 3D package, you save a scene, you save everything, including
all output options. Why should POV prevent this option?

>
> >Also, being able to
> >place the +QR switch in the scene saves a lot of annoying 'no radiosity'
> >moments!
>
> This problem will be fixed in a better way.

That's good news.

All the best,

Andy Cocker


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.